Kazooie Posted September 2, 2011 Author Share Posted September 2, 2011 That was the point in most, as I personal like the look. Link to comment
Kazooie Posted September 2, 2011 Author Share Posted September 2, 2011 xBwolfX, if you are looking for a fight, go elsewhere, I've stopped spamming, trolling, and general annoyance as much as I can, and hope that you will acknowledge that by not treating me as you did before. Thank you. Link to comment
Squared Posted September 2, 2011 Share Posted September 2, 2011 ^ +1 haha kazooie i think your pics are little dark too...i can barely see the rings. Link to comment
xbwolfx Posted September 2, 2011 Share Posted September 2, 2011 Not looking to start a fight, just think your photos would look a lot better if they weren't so dark. Those first three are crazy dark. I don't even know what I'm looking at in the third one it's so dark. How could that possibly be the intended effect? That last one has a lot of potential, but it is lacking contrast or whatever you want to call it. It's just bland. Link to comment
Deleted User 6 Posted September 3, 2011 Share Posted September 3, 2011 xbox is right. lo-fi b&w is one thing. underexposed color photos just reeks of amateur. i think it's less that you like the look and more that you're a noob that needs to take some criticism to heart. if you don't like the heat, don't post your work on the ####ing internet. Link to comment
Kazooie Posted September 3, 2011 Author Share Posted September 3, 2011 Well, I still consider myself an amateur, since I've only been serious about photography for about 6 months. If you look through all the pages, those with comments about technique were appreciated and remembered next time I uploaded a set, as will this criticism. But please, if your going to comments about something, keep it civil. Link to comment
xbwolfx Posted September 3, 2011 Share Posted September 3, 2011 civil? i didn't even call you an idiot or anything kids these days are so sensitive Link to comment
Kazooie Posted September 3, 2011 Author Share Posted September 3, 2011 civil? i didn't even call you an idiot or anything kids these days are so sensitive I don't care about how you act so much, but the last thing Dhaut said was just plain rude. Edit: Looking back though, you do prove a valid point of them being too dark. Link to comment
exosket Posted September 3, 2011 Share Posted September 3, 2011 Kazooie- don't worry about them. You are just starting with photography and it's all about experimenting- trial and error. We all start somewhere. Link to comment
Euphyllia Posted September 3, 2011 Share Posted September 3, 2011 Now that's some photography! Link to comment
Kazooie Posted September 3, 2011 Author Share Posted September 3, 2011 Hmm, not sure how to take that. Either way, I like your pictures, especially THIS one. Thanks exosket though! I still like the look, but I guess others don't! Link to comment
Lalani Posted September 3, 2011 Share Posted September 3, 2011 It was a reference to this: but the last thing Dhaut said was just plain rude. and was supposed to be a funny! Oh wait, you're too young to even recognize that reference, my bad. And thanks! Link to comment
Kazooie Posted September 3, 2011 Author Share Posted September 3, 2011 Ahh, wasn't sure if you were calling me rude or what. But I recognized her from Full House. I've seen it a couple times, but never really cared for it. Link to comment
Euphyllia Posted September 3, 2011 Share Posted September 3, 2011 My prof was taking roll today and he was calling out names... "Stephanie? Tanner?" I started hysterically laughing. People started staring at me, and I was like... "What? Didn't you get the Full House reference? " And they just stared at me. Ahh, wasn't sure if you were calling me rude or what. But I recognized her from Full House. I've seen it a couple times, but never really cared for it. I like the episode where they went to that restaurant and they all jumped off the pirate plank into the ball pit because Danny was embarrassing DJ. Link to comment
Kazooie Posted September 3, 2011 Author Share Posted September 3, 2011 Part 3 Might try some free lensing today. Link to comment
Lalani Posted September 3, 2011 Share Posted September 3, 2011 They're all still very underexposed. Check your camera settings. Link to comment
Kazooie Posted September 3, 2011 Author Share Posted September 3, 2011 What settings would cause underexposing? ISO was at 100, aperture varying from 4.5to 16, and shutter speed from 1/15 to 100ish on average. Link to comment
wvned Posted September 4, 2011 Share Posted September 4, 2011 LOL any of the above sorry it was funny ya suck until you don't and then you will still sometimes Link to comment
Kazooie Posted September 4, 2011 Author Share Posted September 4, 2011 LOL any of the above sorry it was funny ya suck until you don't and then you will still sometimes Sorry but... what? Link to comment
wvned Posted September 4, 2011 Share Posted September 4, 2011 LOL - your post was funny any of the above - any of those settings could cause your pictures to come out exposed incorrectly as it is the chosen combination of those settings that determines what exposure you will end up with. sorry it was funny - apologizing for finding humor in your failure ya suck until you don't and then you will still sometimes - keep trying. you will get better with practice but will still end up with bad shots at times and want to kick yourself Link to comment
Kazooie Posted September 4, 2011 Author Share Posted September 4, 2011 Ooooh, ok, that makes more sense. It was a bit, I just didn't understand it at the time. Link to comment
Kazooie Posted September 6, 2011 Author Share Posted September 6, 2011 Took new dog on walk with the family, and took some mushroom pictures. I know they are heavy in color saturation, but I thought it looks kind of nice. Also figured out how to show the histogram and how to use it. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.