Lalani Posted October 15, 2009 Author Share Posted October 15, 2009 You're allergic to cameras too? Link to comment
Lalani Posted October 15, 2009 Author Share Posted October 15, 2009 Nikon D3s DSLR Has Night Vision With 102,400 ISO Link to comment
summers.enemy Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 I want one of each of these new cameras. Link to comment
Jamie Posted October 22, 2009 Share Posted October 22, 2009 Nikon D3s DSLR Has Night Vision With 102,400 ISO That is absurd. Link to comment
summers.enemy Posted October 22, 2009 Share Posted October 22, 2009 Nikon D3s DSLR Has Night Vision With 102,400 ISO If I'm not mistaken, a couple of days ago the new 1d MkIV was announced with the same top ISO. Has anyone ever shot at 102,400? Or even something above 3200? Is it utilizable? Mostly seems like a sales gimmick to me, but I've never seen it put to a real life test. Link to comment
disaster999 Posted October 23, 2009 Share Posted October 23, 2009 well looking at pics it doesnt seem all that bad...given they are resized, but the performance seems pretty good Link to comment
Lalani Posted November 20, 2009 Author Share Posted November 20, 2009 Hasselblad H3DII-50 Multishot Hasselblad has announced a Multi-Shot (MS) version of its H3DII-50 medium format camera. First shown in the H3DII-39 MS in 2008, the system captures four shots in a row, moving the sensor by one pixel between each shot to record full RGB values at each position. THe H3DII-50 MS costs €23,000 with less expensive trade-in prices and a trade-up route for Hasselblad owners. Link to comment
zjharva Posted November 22, 2009 Share Posted November 22, 2009 i saw a couple 102400 iso pics, and frankly they weren't all that bad noise wise. prob. less than a p and s shooting at 1600 or 800 in normal light Link to comment
HecticDialectics Posted November 22, 2009 Share Posted November 22, 2009 For five thousand dollars, 100k iso better be usable Link to comment
Lalani Posted November 22, 2009 Author Share Posted November 22, 2009 Wouldn't that be awesome though? Think of the voyeuristic opportunities.... and nocturnal wildlife! Link to comment
Nanoized Posted November 22, 2009 Share Posted November 22, 2009 Does anyone here still shoot film? Please don't throw rocks. I still have an F3 and Minolta film scanner. These guys have captured my attention. http://www.dpreview.com/news/0911/09110501olympusep2.asp http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/PanasonicGF1/ Link to comment
Lutra Posted November 22, 2009 Share Posted November 22, 2009 I use digital for most things but I still have an inherited film camera (Olympus OM-10). I like the film because it takes me a month to shoot a roll, by then I have no idea what I am getting back. Also I seem to get more pictures I really like with the film that with digital but that could be because I think more about what I am taking. Thinking that it is ~$0.50 a shot also helps. Link to comment
Lalani Posted March 2, 2010 Author Share Posted March 2, 2010 Noktor Unveils HyperPrime f/0.95 Lens Link to comment
kylegeorge Posted March 2, 2010 Share Posted March 2, 2010 seems overkill. the new sensors are getting so good we'll be shooting in the dark at f8 without noise pretty soon. Link to comment
MR.FEESH Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 I saw that on dpreview...seems..interesting. My only question is...wouldn't you have some serious DOF issues when shooting all the way open? Meaning if you took a picture of someone's face, his/her nose would be in focus, but his/her eyes would be full blown bokeh. And so would be the same with any subject you shoot...so I'm not sure having it that wide is good for anything but close-ups... Link to comment
kylegeorge Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 probably about the same as this. 4x5 with a 105mm at f4.7 which is about the same as f1.4-f2 in 35mm Link to comment
Lalani Posted March 10, 2010 Author Share Posted March 10, 2010 Two new digital medium format cams: http://www.dpreview.com/news/1003/10031002pentax645d.asp http://www.dpreview.com/news/1003/10030801mamiyadm40.asp Link to comment
Deleted User 6 Posted March 10, 2010 Share Posted March 10, 2010 what exactly are they good for at that price? Link to comment
Lalani Posted March 10, 2010 Author Share Posted March 10, 2010 High megapixel count, extremely fine detail, just all around goodness. As with film, due to the increased size of the imaging chip (up to twice that of a 35 mm film frame, and thus as much as 40 times the size of the chip in a typical pocket point-and-shoot camera) they deliver more pixels than consumer-grade cameras, and have lower noise. Features like fan cooling also improve the image quality of studio models. Looking at film frame sizes: Imagine the 35mm box is the size of full frame DSLR sensors.... the rest of those boxes are medium except for the 5x8 is large. The two cams linked above are the 645 size. Link to comment
Deleted User 6 Posted May 11, 2010 Share Posted May 11, 2010 frickin' amazing http://hipstamaticapp.com/ Link to comment
Lalani Posted October 14, 2011 Author Share Posted October 14, 2011 Lytro light field camera Refocus pics after they are taken...! 360 pano ball camera Link to comment
jestep Posted October 25, 2011 Share Posted October 25, 2011 Lytro light field cameraRefocus pics after they are taken...! 360 pano ball camera Beat me to the Lytro. I want one of these. Link to comment
Lalani Posted June 20, 2013 Author Share Posted June 20, 2013 http://petapixel.com/2013/06/20/samsung-announces-the-galaxy-nx-an-android-powered-mirrorless-camera/ Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.