printerdown01 Posted December 13, 2002 Share Posted December 13, 2002 -btw... thanks glen for sending me this link... Ok I know a lot of people out there want another salt comparison, besides the S-15 which seems to be enshrouded in mystery. Now like the S-15. The reporters seem to have taken some liberty in how the over-all picture is drawn... For instance it appears that HW Marine Mix (I have no idea who they are) seem to test higher than Instant Ocean on the first chart, but for whatever reason they were placed below IO (note it is not because of alphabetical order, I know I'm a math and science guy, but I know the order of my alphabet). This alteration indicates that it is "below" IO which it does not seem to be... -haven't finished reading so there may be an explanation towards the end... Salt Review -University of Hawaii, Marine Bio Dept. Link to comment
Dave ESPI Posted December 13, 2002 Share Posted December 13, 2002 Nice link. At least this is verifiable. ttyl. Link to comment
Strife Posted December 13, 2002 Share Posted December 13, 2002 one of the reason why im sticking with IO Link to comment
LiQuiD Posted December 13, 2002 Share Posted December 13, 2002 Likewise I'm sure. IO all the way. Amonia is a little higher than I would like, but as far as everything else goes, hey the bacteria needs to be fed also;) Link to comment
printerdown01 Posted December 13, 2002 Author Share Posted December 13, 2002 The main problem is that it only used 1 sample (from what I've heard). And the main complaint of IO is its inconsistancy... -just a word of caution. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.