Dome001 Posted March 28, 2005 Share Posted March 28, 2005 I have purchased some base rock form www.hirocks.com and someone gave me an unopened bag of aragonite sand. Can i set this up in the tank to start my cycle while I wait for LR? The money I had set aside for the LR and LS purchase is being diverted to buy a puppy for my wife so that I can continue with my hobby when more money comes in in about a month. I was thinking I should setup the baserock and add the sand then drop in a coctail shrimp(as i have heard suggested) and just let the dead sand/rock cylce. Then when I can get the LR and LS add them and let them cycle. (i'm in no rush to get through it all, i kind of enjoy the setup process) Does this sound like a good plan? Dome Link to comment
geekreef_05 Posted March 28, 2005 Share Posted March 28, 2005 Id say to hold onto the aragonite sand and wait for the LR. Then put in the LR and the sand after and let it cycle. happy reefin' Link to comment
Dome001 Posted March 28, 2005 Author Share Posted March 28, 2005 so should i cycle the rock and wait for the sand? or not cycle anything till i can get the LR in? Dome Link to comment
FAC_WNY Posted March 28, 2005 Share Posted March 28, 2005 You aren't going to "cycle" a damn thing without LR....lol. Cheers, Fred Link to comment
Dome001 Posted March 29, 2005 Author Share Posted March 29, 2005 wouldnt bacteria still develop if i put a dead shrimp in there to feed it? Dome Link to comment
nalbar Posted March 29, 2005 Share Posted March 29, 2005 please dont dome, i beg you. it serves no purpose. all you are doing is dumping a bunch of phosphate in your tank. you are NOT 'helping' the cycle, no matter what some say. you are more likely to get an algae problem down the road than anything else. nalbar Link to comment
nalbar Posted March 29, 2005 Share Posted March 29, 2005 you need to do quite a bit of research about what a cycle is. start here, read myth 15 in this article; http://reefkeeping.com/issues/2004-01/eb/index.htm nalbar Link to comment
nalbar Posted March 29, 2005 Share Posted March 29, 2005 http://www.nano-reef.com/forums/showthread...le&pagenumber=1 nalbar Link to comment
Dome001 Posted March 29, 2005 Author Share Posted March 29, 2005 Thanks for the information nalbar, this is why I asked before I did it. I was told by someone else to setup all the LR and LS then drop in a shrimp so I was thinking that even if I was missing the LR and LS i could drop in a shrimp and the bacteria would still develop. This comes partially from my knowledge of fishless cycling a FW tank and I thought a similar process could work w/ SW. Thank you all for an answer and stopping me from making a mistake. Dome Link to comment
BKtomodachi Posted March 29, 2005 Share Posted March 29, 2005 Well, like nalbar's name says, he/she is a "contrarian". That means they tend to say the opposite of what others say. Get it? Go ahead with the shrimp *IF* You arent getting a good amount of ammonia going. Thay way your cycle will "strengthen". Link to comment
Dome001 Posted March 29, 2005 Author Share Posted March 29, 2005 should i not add any shrimp until i have the LR and LS or should I add it with the base rock and sand? I'm a little confused now. Dome Link to comment
nalbar Posted March 29, 2005 Share Posted March 29, 2005 no BK, it will not 'strengthen'. by throwing a shrimp in you will get two things in large quantities, both of which we strive to REMOVE from tanks. ammonia and phosphate. according to 'shrimp people' you want the ammonia because it increases the bacteria. but once the shrimp is consumed (read ROTS) in your tank you have excess bacteria. this is because the bacteria population has sky rocketed. then that bacteria dies from no food, creating ANOTHER cycle. you say 'if you aren't getting a good amount of ammonia going'. you only NEED as much ammonia as you HAVE. you need no more than that. if your tank is not 'creating' ammonia, its a good thing not a bad thing. then there is the phosphate issue. you have dumped a LARGE amount of phosphate in your tank. more than that, you have dumped it in for NO reason. there is no gain to your tank by adding ammonia. the live rock creates enough ammonia for the bacteria. these methods of 'helping' a cycle (an absurd notion) are the greatest myth in reefing. you will not find one single 'expert' author who reccommends either the shrimp or fish way to 'help' a cycle in a tank that contains live rock. all of them say the rock is all you need. i am firmly convinced that at least some of the 'after cycle' algae blooms can be attributed to these methods. of course a fish only tank is totally different. yes, i am a 'contrarian'. but on this subject i am in the mainstream. its the shrimp/fish cycle helpers who are fringe. my 'contrarianism' is my opinions on skimmers/lighting/. nalbar Link to comment
nalbar Posted March 29, 2005 Share Posted March 29, 2005 dome, you 'cycle' when you add your live rock. until you add live rock you will not 'cycle'. if you add a fish or shrimp now you will still cycle when you add rock. the rock has die off, causing ammonia. that die off from the rock is all you need to cycle a reef tank. nalbar Link to comment
Dome001 Posted March 29, 2005 Author Share Posted March 29, 2005 I'm just trying to understand the right way. to do this. my thought process behind doing the shrimp thing before the LR is so that the base rock develops bacteria in it since that was what i thought would eventually happen anyway. Now i know that that would be pointless. now i will see if i can get the LR and LS sooner and set that up and let my tank grow on its own for a few months. Dome Link to comment
nalbar Posted March 29, 2005 Share Posted March 29, 2005 yes, you will get the bacteria. but then that population of bacteria will die back from lack of 'food' (ammonia) after the shrimp rots, leaving little net gain in bacteria, but a LOT of phosphate. if you want, throw a margarita/astria snail in the tank, 'poof', you have bacteria. nalbar Link to comment
Dome001 Posted March 29, 2005 Author Share Posted March 29, 2005 i wasn't aware that a byproduct of the cycleing process was phosphoros. Thank you for all the help nalbar. Dome Link to comment
BKtomodachi Posted March 30, 2005 Share Posted March 30, 2005 You know, I'm just going to solidly disagree with your methods here. But all the more power to you. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.