Jump to content
ReefCleaners.org

175w MH, too much for a 5.5?


MarineMiLk

Recommended Posts

Originally posted by MarineMiLk

i was wondering if that is too much light for a 5.5 nano?....thanks in advance.

 

ummm.... yea! Unless you want to make boiling sea soup.....

Link to comment

You could do it, but you will have tons of heat issues and problems with low light corals bleaching out.

 

Might want to save the 175w for a bigger tanks and try some other kind of lighting system for this small nano.

 

Try for 5-8 with most soft corals and a little higher for clams and anemones.

Link to comment

??? now i'm confused....i got a 20L then my optimal wpg is what?i just decided to order a BlueLine E-Ballast HQI Pendants 150w 20K

is it enough? ( thought 5-8wpg is enough)8)

Link to comment

5-8 is enough. There are some things that prefer more lighting, and it really depends on who you ask. I am not a MH person, which is a whole other topic of its own, so I am sure 5-8 of MH would be perfect. IME 5-8 PC lighting is good for most soft corals. You need more for clams and hard corals, and some anemones. I do know there is a difference between the watts MH gives off and the watts PC lights give off.

 

I am damned sure 175w MH for a 5.5 is overkill.

Link to comment

My clams are in a 10g with 96w PC lighting. I also have a deep sand bed so they are even closer. The only other thing in the tank is some GSP and a blenny (and various cleaners).

 

5-8 is good for MH. If you want to keep clams get closer to 8.

Link to comment

tigs makes a good point, the higher the light from the water the less heat issues you have to worry about. generally people have thier lights about 8 inches from teh water line.

Link to comment

My 2 cents;

 

1) Get a 175W, not a 150W, you will find a greater variety (and better prices) for the bulbs.

 

2) Don't forget that a you have to pay for electricity! So raising your lights to dim them is a waste.

 

3) The wpg rule of thumb is just that. IF you have a short and fat tank, it will take less light than a very tall tank of the same volume.

 

I have a 10g, and I have a 70W MH over it. The tank is 12 inches high and the light is 5 inches over the water. That seems OK.

I think a 175 would be a waste.

 

V

Link to comment

thank for the advise but i had already order the 175w. i think it ok to have a little higher so i can get most of the critter that need higher light..i also order a custom made tank 30"x14x12and a refugium 20"x4x12 a skimmer re** somthing pro(forgot the brand) :blush: still waiting for my LR n LS to come :)

Link to comment

Since the 5.5 isn't all that much shorter than the 10g. I don't see any issues assuming you are going to mount it 8" from the tank. I have a 175w MH pendant with a 14K Hamilton above my 10g. Nothing is "bleaching out" and the SPS and clams are happy as, well....clams :D

 

I do get a lot of spillover light, but hey, I may get a bigger tank someday.

 

The MH is actually quite a LOT cooler than my dual 32w PC setup was in a canopy.

Link to comment

175W is a good choice.

 

I got my double ended MH lights 4" above the water and I also got a IceProbe chiller for my nano. They are good chillers for tanks less than 20G. I think the IceProbe goes for around $150 with the temp controller.

 

Just acclimate your corals to the new light by keeping the lights up higher and gradualy lower them over the weeks. If you see some corals start to bleach just move them off to the side where the light isn't so intense or into the shade.

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recommended Discussions

×
×
  • Create New...