Canadianeh Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 I like Bluefish controller so far (knock on wood), but just like any other tech there is always room for improvement =) Is there an alternative controller for Nanobox? I am referring to an actual controller hardware that can connect using Bluetooth or cable. If I don't have an internet connection, I don't have access to Bluefish controller. If not, are you working on this idea, or is this something that you have in your pipeline? thanks =) Link to comment
Water Dog Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 If you have no internet connection, you could control your lights via a Storm controller. That's how Nanobox lights were controlled before the switch to the Bluefish controller. Link to comment
Canadianeh Posted October 20, 2016 Author Share Posted October 20, 2016 Storm controller is for sale at nanobox? Link to comment
DaveFason Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 Storm controller is for sale at nanobox? I can wire it up this way if needed. Currently I do not have anything in the works for an alternative. I can tell you there will be an update to the app in the next three months. Link to comment
Canadianeh Posted October 20, 2016 Author Share Posted October 20, 2016 I can wire it up this way if needed. Currently I do not have anything in the works for an alternative. I can tell you there will be an update to the app in the next three months. Are we getting a sneak peak of it? lol Link to comment
jimbonds Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 That's a good point. Access only through a cloud hosted system is a serious single point of failure. I love the blue fish but that's always been a concern of mine. Having the ability to access the devices directly through the local area network would be a significant feature improvement. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.