Jordangil Posted December 8, 2012 Share Posted December 8, 2012 It says online that the biocube 29 is 22-3/8"L x 24-3/8"W x 20-5/8"H and a solana 34 is 20x20x20 ..... That makes no sense to me whatsoever . I have seen a solana in person and it was pretty small I see alot of people that have 29 g biocubes online and they look alot bigger . What tank has more overall floorspace ? The solana just seems mad tall as well . I want the biggest all in one I can get and I am thinking either the biocube 29 or the 28g nano cube because of the pure depth of it its like 20x20 of actual tank space . Link to comment
Reeftech Posted December 8, 2012 Share Posted December 8, 2012 The biocube 29 has a slightly bigger footprint. have you considered the reed sea max series or the ecosystems mini 28p Link to comment
Jordangil Posted December 8, 2012 Author Share Posted December 8, 2012 The biocube 29 has a slightly bigger footprint. have you considered the reed sea max series or the ecosystems mini 28p They are to narrow ... I like wide tanks . I am between setting up a 93g cube or nano ... Just not sure if I want to spend the extra on the rock and lighting . Other wise the price is about the same , theres about a 1000 difference though because of the extra 500 in rock and 500 in lighting . Not sure yet though . Link to comment
Reeftech Posted December 8, 2012 Share Posted December 8, 2012 Then the bc29 seems like a good candidate for you. .I would check clist to find some deals. Link to comment
kveekx Posted December 8, 2012 Share Posted December 8, 2012 Im upgradeing my BC29 to a Solana 34. The Solana looks clean and way cooler IMO. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.