myatt Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 They're both beautiful. I'm going pico....any input either way? Link to comment
Funktastic Wint Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 They're both beautiful. I'm going pico....any input either way? which do u think is more aesthetically pleasing? thats what it comes down to. youll probly upgrade the lighting and filtration anyways... Link to comment
el fabuloso Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 I think that the finnex might be harder to aquascape considering it's taller than it is wider. Link to comment
thevidon Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 which do u think is more aesthetically pleasing? thats what it comes down to. youll probly upgrade the lighting and filtration anyways... This is one of the main reasons I like the Finnex Deluxe. The stock light is great for a HOB fuge, and the canister filter can be used as a chemical filtration reactor.......nothing wasted. Link to comment
Mr. Microscope Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 This is one of the main reasons I like the Finnex Deluxe. The stock light is great for a HOB fuge, and the canister filter can be used as a chemical filtration reactor.......nothing wasted. Same with JBJ. I use the stock light for my fuge and the stock filter for Chemi-Pure Elite. Link to comment
myatt Posted February 4, 2011 Author Share Posted February 4, 2011 Thanks, guys. El Fab - you're my pico idol.....read al 75 or so pages. Might end up with a question or two for you! Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.