Jump to content
Pod Your Reef

Neanderthalman's Automatic Water Changer


neanderthalman

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Trust me as long as your PCB is silkscreened/solder masked you can do it easily.

I was 13-14 when I was soldering PCBs together for fun,

I "Just"/"Barely" knew(not much,I'm no electrical engineer!)

how it worked and I had tons of success soldering PCBs.

But I'm cheap(I'm putting it off until I do my big reef)

and will do my own water changes until we own a house,

then I'll pour all my funds into a large reef setup.

Link to comment
The next stage of the project will make it more useful, I assure you.

 

I don't have the correct setup in this apartment, but once I buy a house, the plan is to replace the wastewater bucket with a sewer line, and the refill with a large capacity reservoir. 20g would be sufficient for this tank for a month's worth of water changes, and an even larger reservoir would be even better. Third, connect the ATO reservoir directly to the RO/DI unit, with a separate line for filling the SW reservoir.

 

So, the system will always replenish it's evaporation without any user input. In addition, one can simply press a button on a weekly basis, or, we can set up a real-time clock circuit to do this for us. SW would need to be mixed on a monthly basis, or even less, depending.

 

 

Suddenly more useful, right? :)

 

That's basically the setup I'm trying to put together now. And this module will be a huge help. I still have the problem I mentioned earlier though. I was trying to have a drain line go directly to sewer, but that would create the syphon. It needs some kind of syphon break. I don't have the option of draining above the water line. I don't think a sewer standpipe in the middle of the living room would be tolerated.

Link to comment

Folks,

 

This is *NOT* hard. If the soldering scares you spend the $20 on the PCB fab and get over it. Its an ATO system that is cheaper than a JBJ ATO ($70+) with the ability to handle water changes.

 

Adding in something to mix the salt water for you would not be too difficult to do as well.

 

What he is saying is that you hit the red(or green) button which fires up a maxijet that pulls 10% of your tank water volume out and puts it either into a drain or some other form of container.

 

When a float switch trips it stops. This float switch is supposed to be set for a level in your tank/sump that is equal to 10% of your water volume.

 

Once that float switch trips it shuts off the first maxijet and turns on a second one. The second one then pumps 10% of your water volume in new salt water from a container back into your tank. It stops when a second float switch which is set to the high water mark for a full tank trips.

 

There is a third float switch that is setup as an emergency backup in case the second high water mark float switch fails.

 

No EE degree required.

Link to comment
neanderthalman
Folks,

 

This is *NOT* hard. If the soldering scares you spend the $20 on the PCB fab and get over it. Its an ATO system that is cheaper than a JBJ ATO ($70+) with the ability to handle water changes.

 

Adding in something to mix the salt water for you would not be too difficult to do as well.

 

What he is saying is that you hit the red(or green) button which fires up a maxijet that pulls 10% of your tank water volume out and puts it either into a drain or some other form of container.

 

When a float switch trips it stops. This float switch is supposed to be set for a level in your tank/sump that is equal to 10% of your water volume.

 

Once that float switch trips it shuts off the first maxijet and turns on a second one. The second one then pumps 10% of your water volume in new salt water from a container back into your tank. It stops when a second float switch which is set to the high water mark for a full tank trips.

 

There is a third float switch that is setup as an emergency backup in case the second high water mark float switch fails.

 

No EE degree required.

 

Nice summary. I don't have an EE degree either....... :unsure:

 

I also have it set up so that I use the same pump for mixing the new SW as I do for dispensing it. The hose is simply fed back into a second hole in the bucket lid, and the powerhead plugged into a receptacle near where I store my water.

 

Setting up a system to actually portion out the salt for the SW reservoir would be something else indeed. A little more complicated, for sure.

 

That's basically the setup I'm trying to put together now. And this module will be a huge help. I still have the problem I mentioned earlier though. I was trying to have a drain line go directly to sewer, but that would create the syphon. It needs some kind of syphon break. I don't have the option of draining above the water line. I don't think a sewer standpipe in the middle of the living room would be tolerated.

 

 

I doubt the sewer standpipe in the living room would go well for me either. You have a couple of options, besides creatively hiding a water closet flange below your tank stand.

 

I thought about it a bit today, and came up with a few solutions. One would be a hole in the pipe at the highest point, with the hole squirting back into the sump. Similar to a siphon break hole on a return line. For more control, a "T" hose barb would be better, and you could add in a ball valve back to the tank that would throttle the flow. It would reduce the flow rate out of the sump, but would also break the siphon pretty quickly.

 

Another option would be to make use of the siphon, and put the pump inlet just below the float switch trigger level so the siphon breaks naturally. The pump only "starts" the siphon. I don't like this option, I see it being difficult to get "just right".

 

A third option would be to use a 120V normally closed solenoid valve instead of the pump, and always have the output pipe primed. Instead of turning on a pump, it would open the valve and allow flow through the siphon. The problem here is that there is no guarantee that the siphon will not be lost between water changes (bubbles, etc).

 

A fourth option would be to use both a pump and a 120V normally closed solenoid valve. The pump ensures that a siphon is not needed, and the valve prevents flow when the pump is off. I'd personally go for this option.

 

Another, final option, is to put a sewer standpipe in the room behind the tank (assuming it's not outside), and running the outlet hose through the wall.

Link to comment

Kudos to you on your beautifully simple design. In this day and age, too many turn to programmable circuits to solve their problems, which is overkill for most applications. A correctly designed logic circuit using discrete components is usually more cost effective and very robust.

 

I have to agree that making the traces from solder at a level that complex takes skills. 7.gif

Link to comment
neanderthalman
Kudos to you on your beautifully simple design. In this day and age, too many turn to programmable circuits to solve their problems, which is overkill for most applications. A correctly designed logic circuit using discrete components is usually more cost effective and very robust.

 

I have to agree that making the traces from solder at a level that complex takes skills. 7.gif

 

 

Thanks shcudini :)

 

You know, that's what I thought about the microprocessors. I was rather enamored with them for a time, and had several designs based on PIC microprocessers. They simplified the design process, but did not reduce the number of components. It actually made more of them. For this project, they were more of a crutch than a solution. Eventually I revisited the relays, and found that I could really bring the component count down to a bare minimum.

 

The circuit on the board looks like a snaky mess, but with EAGLE, it's not all that hard to design a complex board like that. You draw out your schematic like a normal wiring diagram, and then it generates a board file with the components in a pile. You place the components where you want them, and it indicates what joins to what by the shortest path using little yellow lines. After that, it literally is an exercise of "connect the dots", only you get to cheat and move the dots to wherever it makes it easier for you. I highly recommend the program to anyone working on their own DIY electrical projects.

 

Actually producing the solder traces wasn't that hard either. I found an easy method for doing it. The first thing I did was solder the relays to the board so I could use them as a point of reference. Then, using a fine tip sharpie, I outlined each trace to match the diagram. After that, just melt enough solder to make the traces. If you get too much on and connect traces where you didn't mean to, just remove the solder with some braid or a desoldering pump. It quite literally moves from a "connect the dots" exercise to a "color between the lines" exercise.

 

 

 

BSD, you get a board etched and bring the components next time you're up, I'll throw one together for you.

Link to comment
Nice summary. I don't have an EE degree either....... :unsure:

 

Cheers.

 

Setting up a system to actually portion out the salt for the SW reservoir would be something else indeed. A little more complicated, for sure.

 

Humm.... I would think that a servo or step motor on a worm drive type shaft with a fixed size container on one end would be the simplest route with you pre loading the container.

 

Or if you want to get more high speed low drag a pressure sensor or scale to measure how much salt is placed into a container then a dump function followed by a water add function based on float sensors coupled with a salinity monitoring probe...

 

Actually you might even be able to take one of those new RKE controllers and use the Salinity probe module they are releasing soon and have it control salt/water dosing into a container based on readings from said salinity probe and float switches...

 

<BAM> my head just exploded. ;) I need to stop now else I will be making this my 'next' project for the new tank...

Link to comment
Thanks schudini :)

 

You know, that's what I thought about the microprocessors. I was rather enamored with them for a time, and had several designs based on PIC microprocessers. They simplified the design process, but did not reduce the number of components. It actually made more of them. For this project, they were more of a crutch than a solution. Eventually I revisited the relays, and found that I could really bring the component count down to a bare minimum.

 

The circuit on the board looks like a snaky mess, but with EAGLE, it's not all that hard to design a complex board like that. You draw out your schematic like a normal wiring diagram, and then it generates a board file with the components in a pile. You place the components where you want them, and it indicates what joins to what by the shortest path using little yellow lines. After that, it literally is an exercise of "connect the dots", only you get to cheat and move the dots to wherever it makes it easier for you. I highly recommend the program to anyone working on their own DIY electrical projects.

 

Actually producing the solder traces wasn't that hard either. I found an easy method for doing it. The first thing I did was solder the relays to the board so I could use them as a point of reference. Then, using a fine tip sharpie, I outlined each trace to match the diagram. After that, just melt enough solder to make the traces. If you get too much on and connect traces where you didn't mean to, just remove the solder with some braid or a desoldering pump. It quite literally moves from a "connect the dots" exercise to a "color between the lines" exercise.

 

Plus the added complications of programming and making sure it doesn't crash or inf. loop.

 

I've used PSPICE which does the simulations and layout. I like that EAGLE is free.

 

I wondered what that black stuff was in between the lines, must be ink from the sharpie. Looks like that board has solder pads around the holes, which probably made the job easier.

 

 

I'm going to save your design and build one when I have a larger tank (with as much simple automation as possible).

Link to comment
BSD, you get a board etched and bring the components next time you're up, I'll throw one together for you.

 

Well, you said they will take a min order of two... what about splitting the cost of a couple with me?

Link to comment

im to lazy to do water changes (once a month if im lucky...sue me)... if you deside to set this up as some sort of unit i could buy let me know... i know i could put it together, but im in grad school and am away from the house literaly from 7am to 10:40pm, so theres no time

 

any way it anything to make life simpler is way cool in my book.. nice job!

 

 

EDIT: i see you may buy those boards... if you set up a group buy on the board let me know... it would be nice to have a weekend project (if i ever get a weekend to myself)

Link to comment
Cool man, get a quote for it and let me know :)

 

 

I'd be in for 3 boards myself. I would estimate that for 100pcs, the board cost should be no more than $5, probably even a lot less than that(maybe $2), but it's been a while since I did an order like this. But you have to find the right PCB house, probably in China, these days....

 

Here's a good example of pricing:

 

http://www.pcb123.com/pcb123pricing.php

Link to comment

I could see this working if you a space for a big water change reservoir but as it stands now I still get glares from the GF when I break out my 5 gal buckets. What I wouldn't give for an equipment room.

Link to comment
neanderthalman

$5 a board is pretty damn good - but I don't have any sensible reason to plunk down $500 for 100 boards. A group buy would be much smaller than that.

 

However, since I'm considering buying at least two, it'd cost $97 from PCB123. However, buying ten would cost only $165. It now makes sense to do a small group buy.

 

Let me think about this one - we just spent about $650 on vet bills, so I don't have the liquidity right now anyways. I think my mind may have been swayed regarding a group buy.

 

 

 

 

Marteen, I've done a couple more water changes since the initial test, and even though I have to bring in the wastewater and refill containers, it's still a lot easier than without. The 5g buckets your GF hates so much would be out of the living room that much sooner. ;)

Link to comment
$5 a board is pretty damn good - but I don't have any sensible reason to plunk down $500 for 100 boards. A group buy would be much smaller than that.

 

However, since I'm considering buying at least two, it'd cost $97 from PCB123. However, buying ten would cost only $165. It now makes sense to do a small group buy.

 

Let me think about this one - we just spent about $650 on vet bills, so I don't have the liquidity right now anyways. I think my mind may have been swayed regarding a group buy.

 

 

 

 

Marteen, I've done a couple more water changes since the initial test, and even though I have to bring in the wastewater and refill containers, it's still a lot easier than without. The 5g buckets your GF hates so much would be out of the living room that much sooner. ;)

 

Well if you decide to do it, I'm in.

Link to comment
Well if you decide to do it, I'm in.

 

I did a little more research on this and found a few things:

 

If you only wanted one PCB fabbed for a prototype, and didn't care if it takes a little time, this place seemed pretty good:

 

http://www.batchpcb.com

 

I actually created gerber files from Eagle using Neandrathalman's design, and uploaded them to see how the process would work, and it looks like one board would cost $27.50 shipped.

 

If it was desired to skip the prototype and just order some boards, 100 boards could be ordered from here at $1.50 each plus shipping(from China):

 

http://www.pcbcart.com/

 

 

I'd be in for a few boards at that price.

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recommended Discussions


×
×
  • Create New...