Bonsai Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 (edited) So I was browsing Flickr for Reef Tanks, and I came across this AWESOME looking tank in someone kitchen. Awesome, right? Then I started looking closer ... there is a tang in that thing, and a ton of other fish and SPS. It's 6.6 gallons! This seems to go against everything nano-reef.com stands for, but WOW. More photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/marcelostworl...57607090370788/ Edited January 18, 2009 by Bonsai Quote Link to comment
pismo_reefer Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 that is quite possibly the coolest nano ive seen.... Quote Link to comment
coralcor Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 thats sweeet but thats what makes people buy tangs........ the tang popo's are late Quote Link to comment
Shadowrider Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 Pretty creative setup. Must be doing something right judging how clean and colorful the tank is. Quote Link to comment
OB1 Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 Cool fuge/sump flower pot?? What kind of lights are those? Quote Link to comment
ddelallata Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 It looks photoshopped to me. Quote Link to comment
Splumph Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 The flowerpot with mangroves is a great idea. Quote Link to comment
Marteen Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 How do you know it's only 6.6 gal? It looks a lot bigger than that. That also has to be the smallest tang I have ever seen as well. In 6 months it will eat the whole kitchen. Quote Link to comment
adolfo425 Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 It has a hang on back filter system but not sure if its plumbed down to another system. Looks good by the way. Adolfo Quote Link to comment
Nick's Reef Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 Daaammmmnnn! If he'd lose the tang that'd be the best nano ever. All those fish are probably needed cause the sps eat their poo and it's bb. That means all those fish are are needed to keep the trates up enough so the SPS don't starve to death. Quote Link to comment
reefer123 Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 foto shop. look at the lighting. best tank i ever seen otherwise. great plumbing job hiding it Quote Link to comment
Bonsai Posted January 18, 2009 Author Share Posted January 18, 2009 How do you know it's only 6.6 gal? It looks a lot bigger than that. That also has to be the smallest tang I have ever seen as well. In 6 months it will eat the whole kitchen. Look at the flickr.com link above, and look at the other photos of this tank ... its real, not photoshopped, and somewhere it says how many liters it is. I just converted liters to gallons and came up with 6.6 G. Crazy, but awesome! Quote Link to comment
MitchReef Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 Oh My God!!!!! That's quite possibly the most amazing nano tank I've ever seen.... Quote Link to comment
Scott Riemer Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 It looks photoshopped to me. Me too. Quote Link to comment
Bonsai Posted January 18, 2009 Author Share Posted January 18, 2009 Me too. Look at the second pic I posted above ... unless they photoshopped Coraline algae in, its real Quote Link to comment
Scott Riemer Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 Didn't say it wasn't a real tank, but I believe the picture has been photoshopped. Quote Link to comment
animalrie Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 Must be 66 gallons. Quote Link to comment
Bonsai Posted January 18, 2009 Author Share Posted January 18, 2009 Didn't say it wasn't a real tank, but I believe the picture has been photoshopped. Interesting theory, but if you look at his photoset on flickr, it looks pretty g'damn real to me. I sent him a message on flickr, I'll see if he replies. Quote Link to comment
Scott Riemer Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 Where's StevieT and the Tang polizia? Quote Link to comment
bredler Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 Must be 66 gallons. If it's 66 gallons then the baby bottle in the picture must be one of those 2gal ones...and the person in the background must be like 7'8" tall...and...and....uhhh hmmm this theory seems full of holes. Quote Link to comment
Scott Riemer Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 Interesting theory, but if you look at his photoset on flickr, it looks pretty g'damn real to me. I sent him a message on flickr, I'll see if he replies. Maybe it is real. Some of the colors and outlines look suspect, that's all I meant. Quote Link to comment
animalrie Posted January 18, 2009 Share Posted January 18, 2009 If it's 66 gallons then the baby bottle in the picture must be one of those 2gal ones...and the person in the background must be like 7'8" tall...and...and....uhhh hmmm this theory seems full of holes. True true. Didn't look closely. Still, that must be a TINY firefish and a TINIER blue tang. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.