zerocool5878 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 I have been maintaining my nano reef at 1.023sg 75 gal FO 1.019 And my sons pico fowlr at 1.019 all with a hydrometer. I have 2 of them and they always give the same reults. One of them is only 1 month old. I always rinse them after testing and boy are they off. Today i bought a refractometer at my LFS. They were showing me how off these really are right in the store. They calibrated it and showed me how it works. I came home and tested all 3 of my tanks. nano 1.026 75 FO 1.021 pico fowlR 1.021 Im really glad I bought this. Cheers Link to comment
moe sizlack Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 IIRC you have to use the hydrometer at the correct temperature. Link to comment
travisurfer Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 i don't know, i use a refractometer Link to comment
Uhuru Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 my IO hydrometer was off by about .002 if it's consistently off by the same amount you can still use it Link to comment
moe sizlack Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 I'm still putting my money on the temp difference. Expansion, contraction... all that science mumbo jumbo. Link to comment
justinl Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 I know my FOWLR is sitting at 1.024 and i maintain that with my hydrometer that consistently reads 1.018. it works well enough even if i cant shoot for a diff SG. Link to comment
Darklyte24 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 mine reads 1.022 so i added more salt came out to 1.023ish, had a guy measure it with refractometer ? or was it chemical, he said it was a bit high, 1.026 so he said my meter was off by 4... oh ya mine is the deep 6 by coralife oh ya again, i heard you should measure at 80*F?.. Link to comment
zerocool5878 Posted June 15, 2007 Author Share Posted June 15, 2007 IIRC you have to use the hydrometer at the correct temperature. I believe that to be incorrect. the two that I have are Seatest and instant ocean swing arm hyrometers. These are no supposed to require temp correction. However they do suck at measuring sg. I don't think that the standard corrections would apply to these 2 hydrometers. Link to comment
Darklyte24 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 http://www.thatpetplace.com/pet/product/ad...e=10#resultBody one of them says 77*F Link to comment
Travis Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 surprisingly, mine was off by -0.001....I could have saved some cash and got a new frag... Link to comment
zerocool5878 Posted June 15, 2007 Author Share Posted June 15, 2007 Just found this http://www.reefkeeping.com/issues/2004-07/rhf/index.php To back up my beliefs that some swing arms do not need temp correction. You can see that the ones listed in the above link show the same results from 68-85 degrees. So temp correction surly will not work on these brands. SeaTest, Deep Six, Instant Ocean and eSHa Marinomat Link to comment
HecticDialectics Posted June 16, 2007 Share Posted June 16, 2007 A few degree temperature difference won't matter... it'll read the same. Link to comment
Gvtv44 Posted June 16, 2007 Share Posted June 16, 2007 .002 Although temp DOES matter, due to thermal expansion, which affects density (Specific Gravity) but the effect is so miniscule, it doesn't matter for our purposes. Volume after Expansion= (Coefficient of expansion)(Volume original)( Delta T) So if you have a given volume of say, 100, and the hydrometer is meant to read at 75 and your tank is 81, then the percent error is... .126%... so the hydrometer would read roughly 1.026 instead of 1.025. But Hydrometers are so inaccurate due to other reasons (miss manufacturing, bubbles, etc) temp differences are negligable. Link to comment
BibleSue Posted June 16, 2007 Share Posted June 16, 2007 Mine is off-off on a shelf FOREVER!!!! Refracto all the way! What a sweet piece of equipment!!! Link to comment
Fishfreak218 Posted June 16, 2007 Share Posted June 16, 2007 I got rid of mine a LONG time ago Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.