stevethao Posted August 12, 2015 Share Posted August 12, 2015 I know this topic has come up numerous times but is the Nanobox really that much better then the rest? I have a 20 long (would like mixed reef). I really do want a Nanobox, but seeing razors sold for $200-$250, I feel like it'll be the better choice. People have had alot of success with the razors so I'm sure it's not a bad light. Would you choose to save the extra $200 and spend it on corals? Link to comment
Addinali Posted August 12, 2015 Share Posted August 12, 2015 I have a razor now and I love it but at the time if I had the extra money I would probably have a nanobox duo right now instead the razor has great pucks but nanobox is just so much more controllable and visually better. Link to comment
Jorgieee Posted August 12, 2015 Share Posted August 12, 2015 I wouldn't say it's better then the other named brand lights out there, but it is a good light it will get the job done. In that price range you you're best bet is a nanobox Link to comment
Havok_9 Posted August 12, 2015 Share Posted August 12, 2015 I personally wouldn't choose a razor for any tank I ran. They are good lights and will grow anything, and while I do like the fact you can mount them on the tank, they give off a very 'disco' lighting effect. As in the color spectrums are intense and don't blend, giving a very unnatural look. I've seen them over many tanks and just not something I would invest in after seeing. I have heard the newer ones might be better. I would save up for a light that I know I will be happy with in the long run, and not settle. Have you considered AI's or Radions? Pricier but impressive. Whats your budget? Link to comment
Boggers Posted August 12, 2015 Share Posted August 12, 2015 Black boxes are cheaper still, but in the end its about what you like to see. All lights will grow coral. Link to comment
ReefWeeds Posted August 12, 2015 Share Posted August 12, 2015 I have a Razor over a 12L right now and a NB retro duo over my 29 biocube. In my mind, there is NO comparison between the two, which is why I just ordered a duo to go over the 12L And to elaborate: I cannot dial in the lights on the Razor anywhere near as good as I can with the NB. the colors are better, much crisper and the controllability is far superior in my mind. Link to comment
curtis72 Posted August 12, 2015 Share Posted August 12, 2015 I just received a nano Box duo and can say there is no disco effect like the the razor, the nanobox led pucks blend so well and the spectrum is arguable the best out there for led pucks and the bluefish mini is awesome. Link to comment
rfalk Posted August 12, 2015 Share Posted August 12, 2015 With the sale going on you could also get 2 AI Prime for $360 but any of the lights will certainly be solid choices. Link to comment
Newtybar Posted August 12, 2015 Share Posted August 12, 2015 I'm very happy with my nanoboxes - the light they put out is so good. One thing to consider, if you like it to get reallly blue, upgrade 4 channel. Link to comment
masterbuilder Posted August 12, 2015 Share Posted August 12, 2015 Razor or Nanobox. Like comparing a '62 Chrysler Wagon to a new BMW. Link to comment
stevethao Posted August 12, 2015 Author Share Posted August 12, 2015 I'm trying to keep my budget under $400 for lights. I've considered Radions also. Maybe I will just bite the bullet and get a Nanobox duo. The lights I have my eyes set on are Radions (used, even gen2), Razor, and Nanobox duo. Link to comment
Muraki Posted August 12, 2015 Share Posted August 12, 2015 Razors are nice solid units, but I prefer the easy and controllability of the nanobox, the Storm X was nice, but the new bluefish units are a cake walk to use, Plus it will create the light graph for you. Another downside to the Razor is the power supply for it is massive. I would rather have an extra plug(s) then the massive power supply. But this is a matter of opinion. Link to comment
HarryPotter Posted August 12, 2015 Share Posted August 12, 2015 I'm trying to keep my budget under $400 for lights. I've considered Radions also. Maybe I will just bite the bullet and get a Nanobox duo. The lights I have my eyes set on are Radions (used, even gen2), Razor, and Nanobox duo. I have a Radion Gen2 and really like it Supports clams, rapid growth and great color SPS, etc. NanoBox lights are also awesome though Link to comment
hinnenkm Posted August 12, 2015 Share Posted August 12, 2015 Personally, I've had both lights as well and to me, there isn't any comparison between the razor and nanobox. The look of the nanobox is very clean and the controllability is a huge plus as well. The razor is a good light, but didn't do it for me as far as aesthetics and how my tank looked.... Good luck with your decision. Link to comment
ReefWeeds Posted August 12, 2015 Share Posted August 12, 2015 Razors are nice solid units, but I prefer the easy and controllability of the nanobox, the Storm X was nice, but the new bluefish units are a cake walk to use, Plus it will create the light graph for you. Another downside to the Razor is the power supply for it is massive. I would rather have an extra plug(s) then the massive power supply. But this is a matter of opinion. I TOTALLY agree, Muraki. The power supply is a beast. And the light is kind of heavy. I also am not a fan of the rimless mount. I don't trust that it will actually hold the light up and not crack the tank. It's shoddy, IMO. Link to comment
stevethao Posted August 12, 2015 Author Share Posted August 12, 2015 I guess I'll have to make my decision on a Radion or Nanobox then! I'll be waiting on Harryjsinger's little lighting experiment. Thank you all for chiming in on your experiences. Link to comment
HarryPotter Posted August 12, 2015 Share Posted August 12, 2015 I guess I'll have to make my decision on a Radion or Nanobox then! I'll be waiting on Harryjsinger's little lighting experiment. Thank you all for chiming in on your experiences. Ahhh don't wait on that. I'll set it up briefly when I get home and take a bunch of pictures comparing the two, but the growth experiment is a no go. NanoBox has better customer service and pucks though Link to comment
stevethao Posted August 12, 2015 Author Share Posted August 12, 2015 Ahhh don't wait on that. I'll set it up briefly when I get home and take a bunch of pictures comparing the two, but the growth experiment is a no go. NanoBox has better customer service and pucks though I'll be waiting on those pics then! Growth is a factor of course, but we all know we want our tanks to look good . Link to comment
Newtybar Posted August 12, 2015 Share Posted August 12, 2015 To be fair on the powersupply issue though - My nanobox duos take up 2 plugs each (4 total). One for fan and one for power supply. This adds a lot of wires in the tank. Link to comment
reefernanoman Posted August 13, 2015 Share Posted August 13, 2015 Nanobox takes my vote. I have a minitde and really like the build quality, color of the LED's, custom exterior colors of the frame(just about whatever you want), no disco effect, great personal CS from Dave, WIFI mini included, etc. I have seen a razor in action and was like "meh". The disco effect was apparent and the colors were not that great. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.