Jump to content


Photo

Do you agree with nano-reef tank size rec's?


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1
sprintermike

sprintermike

    Nano Reefer

  • Members
  • 24 posts
  • Joined 09 Oct 2006

About to get a nuvo 8. This will be the first time I use a tank this small to actually keep a fish in long term.
When looking under the "library" here, I see firefish & sixline wrasse - 10 gal.
Yellowtailed damsel - 5 gallon
Green chromis - 7 gallon
And a few others that seem silly. I know these are minimums, but, green chromis can get really big for a 7 gallon aquarium!
These numbers seem far less than what I see on other sites.
What say you, Nano reef members?

#2
C.I._Reefer

C.I._Reefer

    Nano Reefer

  • Members
  • 1,077 posts
  • Joined 20 Jan 2012
maybe it is cuz chromis and damsels are sh.it fish that no one really cares about :P. Seriously though, some are on the low side. I typically use live aquaria for recomendations, and then subtract 10-20% for a bare minimum recommendation

#3
Salty_Snack

Salty_Snack

    Nano Reefer

  • Members
  • 497 posts
  • Joined 11 Jan 2012
+1.

I was considering the nuvo 8 but after calculating that the display only holds about 5.5 gallons and after the addition of substrate and rock it would be around 4 - 4.5 gallons I decided to get the nuvo 16.


our mother ####in focus will do 80 easy, punk ass #####. i'm sure it will do like 90. we just got new tires!


#4
asting

asting

    Nano Reefer

  • Members
  • 1,451 posts
  • Joined 31 Jul 2009
  • Cleveland, OH
Vendors are always going to err on the side of caution and over estimate.
Compared to other sites, this one does recommend much more liberal stocking. Think of it this way:
This site is going to attract those with smaller aquariums, so naturally other sites won't be as appealing to those with small aquariums. As a result everyone who uses them migrates here, and whats left are those who are traditional and suggest the ridiculous things like "1 inch/ten gallons" and other stupid rules of thumb. These same people then put 5-6 tangs in a 180 gallon tank, breaking their own "rule."

I think this whole gallons definition is stupid also, because the footprint of the tank is much more important than the number of gallons (assuming the biological load isn't the issue). Fish tend to swim back and forth along a tank, not up and down.

If you're looking for a fish, I would stay away from the six line, because that seems like it's pushing it more than the firefish or other fish on that list.

Edited by asting, 03 March 2012 - 07:57 AM.


#5
Pili

Pili

    Nano Reefer

  • Members
  • 2,492 posts
  • Joined 14 Jun 2005
  • Orlando, FL
The nuvo 8 is pretty tiny. I would keep to 1 or 2 gobies, nothing more.

#6
lakshwadeep

lakshwadeep

    v rotating snakes! v

  • Premium Members
  • 21,369 posts
  • Joined 28 Mar 2003
  • Salt Lake City (formerly OKC)
Like asting said, most other forums consider the majority of our tanks as too small for any fish. In actuality, many fish can be kept in fairly small tanks, but we can still make some decisions on what is appropriate. Behavior is very useful; a hyperactive fish like a flasher wrasse would benefit from more room than a similarly sized ocellaris/percula clownfish.

Also, remember manufacturers often count the back chambers and other non-display areas into the total volume, making their actual sizes smaller than advertised.

↳Malcolm

Newer! ADA 60-F

New ADA 60-P - Gobyopolis
my 20H  retired

 

Every lie tells another truth.
-John Burns