Jump to content


Photo

Chemi-pure elite & Purigen


  • Please log in to reply
55 replies to this topic

#51
GTO NEMESIS

GTO NEMESIS

    Nano Reefer

  • Members
  • 31 posts
  • Joined 15 Feb 2012
  • London, UK

And after a further 15 mins of rinsing this is what happened to my tank when I added it:
Very very cloudy water
Posted Image

Would I buy it again? - No. At least not for such a small tank (46L/12G)
Will I be leaving it in there? - Probably not, depending on what it looks like in an hour

One thing that I immediately don't like is the reduced water flow.


I think I will be going back to the stock Edge set up.

Edited by GTO NEMESIS, 31 March 2012 - 07:20 AM.

46L Fluval Edge - 15 Kgs Live Rock - 10 Lbs Live Sand - 3 Peppermints - 2 Clowns - 1 FireFish - 3 Blue Hermit Crabs - Collection of snails
http://www.nano-reef...howtopic=294994

#52
gbose

gbose

    Nano Reefer

  • Members
  • 60 posts
  • Joined 04 Dec 2011

Both are useless products.

MikeTR,

Why do you say that?

GBose

#53
nyknicks4412

nyknicks4412

    Nano Reefer

  • Members
  • 316 posts
  • Joined 26 Jun 2011

And after a further 15 mins of rinsing this is what happened to my tank when I added it:
Very very cloudy water
Posted Image

Would I buy it again? - No. At least not for such a small tank (46L/12G)
Will I be leaving it in there? - Probably not, depending on what it looks like in an hour

One thing that I immediately don't like is the reduced water flow.


I think I will be going back to the stock Edge set up.


Is that Chemi-Pure? If it is you didn't rinse it enough....the stuff works like a charm. I run both Chemi-pure and Purigen and my tank is crystal clear.

#54
JDK

JDK

    Nano Reefer

  • Members
  • 611 posts
  • Joined 21 Sep 2011
  • Ohio
For nano AIO tanks IMO the only way to go is GFO and BRS Rox carbon in this reactor-> LINK-

I used the CPE and Purigen for months. CPE does a very good job at making the water crystal clear (Rox carbon does this very well too). Purigen I believe does relatively nothing. I did substantial tests to determine if it was keeping nitrates down or actively lowering them and I found zero evidence of this. The GFO in the CPE does relatively nothing as well. The only way to really really lower phosphates with GFO is to run it actively where you can control contact time and have UPWARD adjustable flow through the media. This pertains to carbon as well but to a much lesser extent. Downward flow with gravity through a media bag is a futile effort. Water will find the path of least resistance every single time. Media baskets help but physics will win out every time. This effect is limited substantially when water is pushed upwards through a reactor instead of flowing with gravity downwards.

Passively running GFO is like being in a room full of flies and chasing them with a fly swatter trying to kill them one by one. Actively running GFO is like hanging 30 strips of fly paper and letting them come to you and catching them all.

After switching to the reactor linked above it is like a night and day difference with excess nutrients. I have it in the rear chamber of my Biocube 29 Best purchase I have ever made for my tank and would recommend it to anyone with a sumpless AIO. Cheaper and more effective.

Just my .02- Both are expensive and not worth the $

Edited by JDK, 02 April 2012 - 02:51 AM.


#55
Captain Hook

Captain Hook

    Nano Reefer

  • Banned by Moderators
  • 762 posts
  • Joined 17 Feb 2011
Good water polishers thats about it....and a good waste of money...CPE is 15$ I would rather buy a frag...I have biological filtration and a skimmer and it works great. Carbon and CPE are a waste of money IMO if your tank is maintained properly.

Edited by Captain Hook, 02 April 2012 - 02:14 AM.

MY 55g SPS/LPS holding cell

 

 

http://www.nano-reef...s-holding-cell/


#56
nyknicks4412

nyknicks4412

    Nano Reefer

  • Members
  • 316 posts
  • Joined 26 Jun 2011

For nano AIO tanks IMO the only way to go is GFO and BRS Rox carbon in this reactor-> LINK-

I used the CPE and Purigen for months. CPE does a very good job at making the water crystal clear (Rox carbon does this very well too). Purigen I believe does relatively nothing. I did substantial tests to determine if it was keeping nitrates down or actively lowering them and I found zero evidence of this. The GFO in the CPE does relatively nothing as well. The only way to really really lower phosphates with GFO is to run it actively where you can control contact time and have UPWARD adjustable flow through the media. This pertains to carbon as well but to a much lesser extent. Downward flow with gravity through a media bag is a futile effort. Water will find the path of least resistance every single time. Media baskets help but physics will win out every time. This effect is limited substantially when water is pushed upwards through a reactor instead of flowing with gravity downwards.

Passively running GFO is like being in a room full of flies and chasing them with a fly swatter trying to kill them one by one. Actively running GFO is like hanging 30 strips of fly paper and letting them come to you and catching them all.

After switching to the reactor linked above it is like a night and day difference with excess nutrients. I have it in the rear chamber of my Biocube 29 Best purchase I have ever made for my tank and would recommend it to anyone with a sumpless AIO. Cheaper and more effective.

Just my .02- Both are expensive and not worth the $


Curious what tests you preformed with the purigen to see if it was useful or not?