Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: ReefBuddy DIY Aquarium Controller $89
Nano-Reef.com Forums > System Setup > Do It Yourself

gwenhastings
pins and needles??
gwen
edlikestoboogie
I am designing a similar product as yours but for hydroponic applications. I have everything working except the EC meter, just as you said, it is the most painful, out of the other simpler sensors. Could you please provide me with a little bit of help? The schematic you modified for your design, Isabella's. Any tips you can give me about her circuit. I built it, and ran it using +15v, -15v from a 1 watt DC-DC converter, since that is all I have and it did not work. I guess I should use the +12/-12? You said you had to modify her circuit, what modifications have you done?

Please PM me if you get a chance. I would greatly appreciate any help.
hcsceo
QUOTE (edlikestoboogie @ Dec 13 2009, 03:24 AM) *
I am designing a similar product as yours but for hydroponic applications. I have everything working except the EC meter, just as you said, it is the most painful, out of the other simpler sensors. Could you please provide me with a little bit of help? The schematic you modified for your design, Isabella's. Any tips you can give me about her circuit. I built it, and ran it using +15v, -15v from a 1 watt DC-DC converter, since that is all I have and it did not work. I guess I should use the +12/-12? You said you had to modify her circuit, what modifications have you done?

Please PM me if you get a chance. I would greatly appreciate any help.


Sent you a PM on your questions for the circuit.

Did someone say the economy was getting better? I just survived a second round of layoffs at my office.
gwenhastings
Hi All,
to the developers, any chance the complete schematic can be open sourced early? I have a a 8.5"x11" pluggable bread board to construct it on and I am ordering 1500 jumpers from ebay smile.gif

even that would give me something to play with.. especially interested in the EC section as I need dual EC measurement circuits and I understand you are only putting a single EC mesurement section in (why I wanted to know the cad program so I can extend the Board if necessary.

Did you in fact go with a pwm/software generated sine as the ac generation component of your EC measurement circuit?(how is it working in test for you?)


gwen




QUOTE (hcsceo @ Dec 14 2009, 07:11 AM) *
Sent you a PM on your questions for the circuit.

Did someone say the economy was getting better? I just survived a second round of layoffs at my office.

DHaut
I think this controller is going to be amazing. Too bad I can't understand a word of what's going on.
jdskidawg
+1 on that! LOL
Mr. Green
Why not just use a smart relay or PLC? Basically that is what your building. Ladder logic is super easy, a five year old can program a plc. I'm guessing cost may be the issue with plc.

I'm currently designing a low cost temp probe with analouge to digital conversion for less than $20. $20 per temp probe/controller expandable to as many I/O ports on your relay/plc. In theory you could control the temp of every tank in a store and the lights/heater ect. will turn off if max temp limit. Will post the diy for this once it's finished (will basically replace $1k plus A/D temp controllers)

I think plc control is really the best option, infinite control options only bounded by the limits of your imagination.
gwenhastings
So does this effort still live ? Merry Xmas to all, suspect thats where everyone has been. but still would be nice to hear from steve or firebird...



gwen
FuzzBall03
I've been keeping my eye on this thread for sometime. I really hope that this does come to be a successful and sell-able product. I wanted to thank you guys for your effort, and can't wait to see a final product.

I'd be more than happy to be a beta tester of any sort. I've got years and years of soldering experience ranging from motherboards to simple car stereo varieties. I've got a very good general understanding of programming languages, though I only knew a few. I have a 58gallon mixed reef setup I'd be able to try this on.

Anyways, keep up the good work!
Militant Jurist
Hopefully things are still alive and well (I'd imagine so)!
TAftonomos
Very interested in this. Long time lurker, rarely post.

PLEASE complete this smile.gif
hcsceo
LOL yes this thing is still alive. I'm poked firewolf we'll see how he is coming.

Steve
1blackchicken
Definitely tagging along on this one. Thanks for all your hard work to further this hobby for us poor folk who love DIY!!
farkwar
?
evilc66
Ouch, harsh.
Militant Jurist
Harsh toke, dude.

sleep.gif
hcsceo
Ouch that hurts tongue.gif Yea it's been a while so I don't blame you.
doktorstick
Is it time to find someone else to do the PCB layout? Is that all that's holding up the project?
Billdemart
QUOTE (The Propagator @ May 1 2009, 07:56 AM) *
This is excellent for those electronics savey individuals who are good wiht an iron.....BUT
Dude you know you are going to get bombed with people who couldn't solder a single connection with absolutely nothing around it if their life depended on it. Those are the people that will be the majority of your 1st run I bet. They'll see the price and what it does then hop on it. Two days later destroy it with an iron and blame you. sad.gif


Yeah I was wanting to buy one fully assembled with instructions. I don't DIY anything. I'd rather pay for it done by someone who knows what they are doing.

I guess I'm in the wrong thread?
bad inferno
For those of you who want to limit the amount of contruction and soldering use "1wire devices" connected to a small linux box. That way you move soldering and programming a CPU into some script files running on a small computer. I know the disadvantages of having to run a small PC however the wiring is so simple and mine doubles as my web server. www.rjconway.homeip.net
perikaruppan
Hi friends,
I have completed my arduino controller with power module and lights using I2C mainly.

But i am having this issue:

When the power module is turned on or off (any of the switches) then ARduino goes into Freeze mode and the LCD blanks and the keyboard becomes inactive.

I have made this Aquarium controller for my aquarium. Written the code with a help of a few members in this forum and all seems to work perfectly

I am mainly using I2C to control my devices.

The main layout is :


The Display of the controller : have another display also attached to the system for secondary viewing.


The controller with the I2C, Clock and with the back of the LCD panel and the Keyboard


The power Module, using ULN 2003 and Relays. The Power module is Connected to the Controller using a 25Pin DB Wire.


The Outlook of the power Module


These are the problems: (I think they are related)

1. When the power module is not connected to the main system, the system works perfectly. There is a mode called FEEDMode, when i am into that mode by press of a key in the keypad, a few of the power modules are to TURN OFF for a period of time and then TURN ON again after that period, this works perfectly when the power Module is not connected to the system.
But when i connect the power Module to the system, and go into that FEED MODE it TURNS OFF the devices, goes through the Count and then TURNS on the DEVICES but the moment it turns ON The Devices the LCD goes BLANK with just a display of "1" in the SCREEN and KeyPad is FROZEN.. .so i need to restart the Arduino by powering it down and then ON it again.

2. Some times when there is a power Outtage, and when the System turns on again, i go into the Blank Screen Mode and Frozen keypad. But all the other controls in the Power Module are WORKING...

I even put diodes across the Relays to protect them, but no USE.

The Arduino Goes into FREEZE Mode when it handles the Power Module that is done using UNL2003/2004 ICs and Relays. The ULNs drive the Relays (+5v) and Relays Output (230vac) control the Motors and Pumps.

People on ardunio forum suggested it is de-coupling and i need to add capacitors to the pwr supply. and i did that still no effect.

Did you come across any such problem? or can you help me?
newhobby
I did have similar problem and can give you some pointers, but I think you should not steal the thread.
Create your own and people may help you out.
Sry for rudeness
edlikestoboogie
QUOTE (hcsceo @ Jan 18 2010, 11:36 AM) *
Ouch that hurts tongue.gif Yea it's been a while so I don't blame you.


Hi Steve,

I couldn't send you a PM since your inbox is full, so I will send a message here:

I am very sorry for the late reply. But I have been working on other aspects of the project and have now realized the EC section. I have gotten the original EC circuit to work with +-15volts changing some resistor values. What I am concerned about is the fact that I am getting a sine wave of 20 volts peak to peak. I thought this circuit was designed for low voltage low current for the AC signal sent through the liquid being measured? I am concerned about this as I don't want interference with my pH circuit. I was advised by my friend who constructed and modified the circuit to use 1.2 volt zeners instead of the other ones used for the sine wave, reducing voltage to a quarter? Please let me know what you think about my concerns. I also made other small changes like using a full wave rectifier instead of using the 4 rectifier diodes. The EC probe I am using is from bluelab, from a unit like this: http://www.getbluelab.com/shop/Bluelab+Combo+Meter%99.html

I am actually planning on going to Shanghai next week and while there would like to find a source for EC and pH electrodes, please let me know if you would like any info I obtain.

QUOTE
+15 and -15 should work but you might have to make resister changes for the increase in volts. If you want to bypass that work then just use a 12volt for the power. Did you use an Oscope to check for oscillation? This is the very first thing you have to verify. If you are not getting a nice sinewave you won't get anything on the circuit. It is a very fine line between nothing and a good sinewave so the oscope is a must. The best way to test the circuit is to check the result after each amp going to the next and make sure you are getting the required results. Finally, what EC probe are you using. Send me a link to it.

Steve


QUOTE
Hello Steve,

It is of utter importance that I get in contact with you as soon as possible. I am designing a similar product as yours but for hydroponic applications. I have everything working except the EC meter, just as you said, it is the most painful, out of the other simpler sensors. Could you please provide me with a little bit of help? The schematic you modified for your design, Isabella's. Any tips you can give me about her circuit. I built it, and ran it using +15v, -15v from a 1 watt DC-DC converter, since that is all I have and it did not work. I guess I should use the +12/-12? You said you had to modify her circuit, what modifications have you done?

thank you,.
perikaruppan
My sincere apologies. Sorry for trying to hijack. Will make anew post.
afgun
I'm interested in this project as well. Just setting up a new tank and I'd like to build one for it. I'm in the ATX area, so if you could use some help with anything, please let me know!
Militant Jurist
Any updates on the ReefBuddy?
icecool2
Just throwing this out there.... I can do PCB layouts if needed...
Milamber
Is it safe to say this project is dead?
I see19 pages and 10 months in with not much to show.
evilc66
Are you serious? Are you aware as to the amount of effort required to do all of this? And with them only being able to invest a little time per week into getting it done? This is a huge task, and will take time.
Milamber
QUOTE (evilc66 @ Feb 14 2010, 12:29 PM) *
Are you serious? Are you aware as to the amount of effort required to do all of this? And with them only being able to invest a little time per week into getting it done? This is a huge task, and will take time.


No, I'm not aware of the amount of time other than the original goal. I do know a rough prototype was available back in the spring and the PCB layouts have been a work in progress since November. The developer last posted a month ago and the PCB guy over two months ago. There have been no progress updates since.

I'm sure I'm not the only one wondering what happened to this project.
Bump for updates to keep this project alive...

brun129
QUOTE (Milamber @ Feb 15 2010, 10:01 AM) *
No, I'm not aware of the amount of time other than the original goal. I do know a rough prototype was available back in the spring and the PCB layouts have been a work in progress since November. The developer last posted a month ago and the PCB guy over two months ago. There have been no progress updates since.

I'm sure I'm not the only one wondering what happened to this project.
Bump for updates to keep this project alive...



+1 - This project, which was scheduled to take 5 months by the person creating is 7 months behind; although apparently development is complete and the project is waiting on a board layout.

I understand that the creators have personal lives and have limited time to dedicate to this effort and I have no problem with delays - But the very least that could be done is regular updates on why the long delay. A massive amount of hype was created around this project and creator has a responsibility to deliver SOMETHING; be it in the very least, updates.

I for one say that the OP make good on his promise for this to be an open source project. I understand that he may not have the time to finish; But give us the schematics and source. That way someone who DOES have the time and resources can finish the project and deliver it to the community.
evilc66
I don't see why everyone is getting so hostile about this. It's not like you have laid out money for a pre-order of the controller. If you want an update, ask for an update. Don't attack the guys that are basically volunteering their time to create something that will benefit others in the end. I don't see any of them taking home a paycheck as a result of this developement effort. If you think you can help, PM the OP about it. This isn't the way to get things done faster.
brun129
I'm not getting hostile; But I, like everybody else, would like to know what's going on. Looks like many people have asked for updates and have gotten no real response. Look at post at post 373 on page 19; kind of hard to PM somebody when their inbox is full.

You're right, I didn't put a pre-order down. But I also never asked Steve to build it for me. Steve came out and made promises about this controller.

If somebody promises you something and promises to give it to you by a certain date and then on top of that tells you that they'll give it to you for free (as in speech) you're gonna get excited. Now after 4 months of "almost there" and then another 3 months of ZERO updates - You'd get a little upset, no ?

I feel that if Steve and Firewolf can't finish the project, they should release the code and schematics so that we can either build it for ourselves or that another user who has the time can finish the project for the community.

neanderthalman
QUOTE (brun129 @ Feb 15 2010, 12:11 PM) *
If somebody promises you something and promises to give it to you by a certain date and then on top of that tells you that they'll give it to you for free (as in speech) you're gonna get excited. Now after 4 months of "almost there" and then another 3 months of ZERO updates - You'd get a little upset, no ?

I feel that if Steve and Firewolf can't finish the project, they should release the code and schematics so that we can either build it for ourselves or that another user who has the time can finish the project for the community.


It's clear you've never been on the other side. These projects take time - usually far more time than anticipated. Things come up. Roadblocks get in the way. Attention gets diverted. Finances get strained. Welcome to reality.

You should take your entitlement issues and STFU. The designers owe you nothing. They don't owe you the finished product. They don't owe you the source code, schematics, or board layout - ever heard of intellectual property rights? They don't owe you shiat. They can choose to release it to the community, and I hope they still do. However, if you keep up with your needy demanding bullshiat, I wouldn't blame them for taking their ball and going home.

They're doing some damn good work, and it's in your best interests to STFU and let them finish. You can either have it done right, or you can have it done right now. Give them the time to perfect it.

If you can't wait, then GTFO and design your own.
evilc66
Since when has anything been on time? Microsoft has been pushing off WinMo7 for almost 2 years. Sony has delayed numerous Gran Tourismo games for months/years past their initial delivery date (Gran Tourismo for PSP is a great example, as that was supposed to be a PSP launch title). And yes, I know these are completely different scales, but that's multi billion dollar companies with thousands of employees working on big projects, versus two guys with little to no budget working on a relatively big project (for them).
Milamber
I agree that they owe us nothing. They don't owe us code, schematics, designs, etc. None of us have anything invested in their success or failure.
They only thing I think they should do is provide updates on where this project stands and if they are still interested in completing this project. We are obviously interested in this project from the amount of posts there have been.
evilc66
And that's good that you are interested. What you must also note is that Steve hasn't been on the site as a whole in almost a month, so something must be going on that is preventing progress and updates. Firewolf4 hasn't been on since December 12th.
neanderthalman
They also don't owe us an update, and explanation, or a schedule. It would be nice to hear something, but they are under no obligation whatsoever.
C-Rad
QUOTE (neanderthalman @ Feb 15 2010, 03:33 PM) *
They also don't owe us an update, and explanation, or a schedule. It would be nice to hear something, but they are under no obligation whatsoever.

I couldn't agree more, and I find the sense of entitlement behind these complaints to be disturbing. They are trying to do us a huge favor, and the last thing they deserve is to hear complaints about how the huge favor is taking too long. These guys don't owe me a darned thing, and if they stop right now, and never get around to finishing it, they deserve nothing but my gratitude, for blazing this trail, and for what I've learned from reading this thread.
gwenhastings
And I have learned a lot also, AND that being said there are many of us here who COULD help effectively in prototyping circuits and PCB layout as well as writing code of various flavours to drive the whole lashup.

Its possibly out of that wanting to help so badly and being unable to as the developers havent reached out for same that is driving a LOT of the frustration I suspect, not so much a sense of entitlement in a lot of cases.(remember a LOT of us dont have very good social skills or extensive human socialization on this blog).

I for instance want nothing more than the near final schematic so I can breadboard the device up to write my own flavor of code for same, I dont care a whit about PCBs at this point until that is done, others here have professed interest in assisting with developing PCB layouts and manufacture.

The real point here is while I am ecstatic that the project has advanced to this point and its proposed it be a community/opensource project , we will have to wait for the developers to reach out by making the schematic available to the rest of us before we can assist effectively with further progress, like for instance what mods have been made to Isabella's circuit to integrate it with the 644P(ie glue and interface circuitry)
Were hardware PWM signals substituted for the sine wave gen sections of isabellas circuit?

I have another thousand questions or so that will be settled with the chance to see only the schematic.

I do invite the developers to reach out and involve the rest of us by releasing the schematic, but until/unless that happens we will have to sit here patiently and not let our frustrations get the better of us.



regards
gwen hastings - a would be reef buddy developer..


QUOTE (C-Rad @ Feb 15 2010, 04:32 PM) *
I couldn't agree more, and I find the sense of entitlement behind these complaints to be disturbing. They are trying to do us a huge favor, and the last thing they deserve is to hear complaints about how the huge favor is taking too long. These guys don't owe me a darned thing, and if they stop right now, and never get around to finishing it, they deserve nothing but my gratitude, for blazing this trail, and for what I've learned from reading this thread.

brun129
@gwenhastings

Those are my feelings exactly.

I never said the they OWE me anything, I never complained about the time that it's taking to develop the project. What I did say was the opposite of that - I said I have no problem with delays.

But like everybody else following along, I feel discouraged that there are no updates to the status of the project. With nearly 40, 000 views of this thread; I suspect there a few more disappointed people.

I mention the publishing of schematics and source not because I feel "entitled" to it; but because Steve himself not only proposed this to be an open source project, he himself said that he was excited to release the source material and see where the community would take this project.

@neanderthalman

I don't see why the need for personal attacks

Yes, I have been on the other side and I do know about delays and setbacks. I had all my livestock sitting rubbermaid containers for 4 weeks because of setbacks and stuff just playing out the wrong way.

I don't need them to rush their design for me because I've already built myself a controller; which I'm in the process of moving from a breadboard to soldered prototype board. I am however very interested in seeing their schematics and code and maybe learn from their work to optimize my circuits and code. Should Steve choose not release those - I'm not worried, my prototype does what I need it to do in it's current incarnation.

The whole point of the DIY forum is to share knowledge and experiences and help others in the process correct ? Steve's project would be a great help not only to the nano-reef.com community but to the reef-keeping community in general. I hope he does end up sharing his knowledge and experience (like he promised us he would) with everyone.

BTW... Why not be civil and leave the "STFU and GTFO" for the playground ?
neanderthalman
QUOTE (brun129 @ Feb 16 2010, 12:40 AM) *
@neanderthalman

I don't see why the need for personal attacks

Yes, I have been on the other side and I do know about delays and setbacks. I had all my livestock sitting rubbermaid containers for 4 weeks because of setbacks and stuff just playing out the wrong way.
<snip>

BTW... Why not be civil and leave the "STFU and GTFO" for the playground ?



Perhaps, if you're having these setbacks with your tank, you should give me your livestock. That way someone else can finish what you started.

Replace your livestock with their design, and you'll notice that this is the very same demand that you made. Yet, if I were to actually demand this of you, I'd get the STFU and GTFO treatment, would I not?

You get only as much civility as you deserve. When you make rude demands, you get treated rudely.
evilc66
Well, this bickering between all of us isn't making this thread any more productive, so it should end now.

Would it be nice for them to give us an update? Sure.

Should they post the schematics and source code? Maybe, but they don't have to. It's their work.

Should we all play nice and wait for the next update? Definitely.

Like I mentioned before, neither Steve or Firewolf4 have been on in quite a while, which is at least unusual for Steve, so something must be going on that is slowing progress. Beyond this, we can only speculate.
Daemonfly
If they're just waiting on the PCBs, then, imho, there's no reason to not just post the code & schematics if it truly is "open source". Of course, that's a purely "it would be nice" scenario.

There was a lot of interest in this project, here as well as other boards (incl RC), but it's dwindled, and other projects are well on their way or even completed, with full code. As an example: http://reefprojects.com/w/phpBB3/viewforum.php?f=8

If you've been waiting on this project, perhaps it's worth it to check out the other stuff that's come out recently and see if they're at your level of skill.
neanderthalman
Well.....there is reason Dae. "open-source" doesn't mean it's given away incomplete, or is fully open during development.

You're missing a key point - glory. The guys on this project have a right to be proud of their work, and to release it as a completed unit. To take their virtually-completed project, and have someone else finish it, is to steal that opportunity for glory from them and give it to that someone else. No-one cares if you ran 99m in record time. You've gotta go the full 100.

Glory and pride is the return for their hard work.

It'd be nice for us if it were released as-is - but it wouldn't be nice for them. I think they should finish it and not someone else. They deserve that much.
hcsceo
Well I have to agree with everyone, an update is needed. No worries for those of you that are frustrated and thank you to those who have defended. It is true things have been moving very slow. Firewolf has been very busy in his personal life as I have. I had hoped to deliver this last year in September so that I could get in front of the hunting season knowing I would have no time to work on this till after Spring Turkey's.

This brings us to the next part.... I need the PCB done and I think the fastest way to get it done is to release the project as it sits right now. All the circuits are complete and tested and all I need is someone to design the PCB so I can cut it on the CNC. I just don't have the time to do the PCB work right now. Firewolf has had this since September and I haven't seen anything yet so I suspect his life is as busy as all of ours. The programmer is at a standstill till we get the final PCB completed. Anyone interested in helping with the PCB design please IM me. I'm cleaning out my inbox as we speak. The only requirement is that the PCB is designed to fit in a box that is already selected to accept our keypad.

Please let me know if you are interested. I'm sure we could get this done in a month with a little help.

Thanks

Steve


OK guys I got my account upgraded back to premium so I can get IM's again. LETS GET IT DONE smile.gif)

Steve
doktorstick
Woot! I think there are multiple people willing to do the PCB layouts. Give it to them all and let them race... for glory.
driftsaru
I agree with evil.

How about you ALL come over to my place. I'll grill up some bratwurst, which we'll wash down with Warsteiner, then who ever still has beef can throw-it-down in a game of quarters. Civilized enough. wizard.gif
hcsceo
QUOTE (doktorstick @ Feb 18 2010, 10:21 AM) *
Woot! I think there are multiple people willing to do the PCB layouts. Give it to them all and let them race... for glory.


LOL, PCB design competition. I want all the chips to show artistic expression when layed out wink.gif

OK what I have is the schems, the PCB outline, LCD plug and keyboard plug locations which can't change. The schems in include every part number and Digikey part number for every part needed to complete it.

Steve
DHaut
For the people wanting more regular updates and a faster finished product, why don't you paypal the designers some money. A few thousand bucks would probably help them move faster, I bet wink.gif
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Copyright © 2001-2011 Nano-Reef.com | Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.