QUOTE (dshnarw @ May 22 2009, 01:00 PM)

Trigger, despite what you might think, it's not a personal thing for any of us who have expressed our annoyance with your posts.
How are annoyances NOT personal?
QUOTE (dshnarw @ May 22 2009, 01:00 PM)

It's simply frustrating to deal with someone who hasn't taken the time to learn basic terminology beforehand.
Sorry to have frustrated you with my lack of basic knowledge of macro photography and what not, I know more than you think I do about photography basics, maybe not macro but I do have a some experience in photography, despite the opinion you have drawn of me. I have been reading the links you and others have provided on the macro stuff, its cool, but still prefer conversations and inputs.
QUOTE (dshnarw @ May 22 2009, 01:00 PM)

If you want links to some good photography primers, I think we'd all be glad to give you our favorites (although Google would be a great starting point, as would some of the old threads around here). Once you can understand the language, and have a fully functioning camera, we'd be more than glad to deal with the more complicated/subtle aspects of photography with you.
Thanks. I've gotten some good links from here and you all.
QUOTE (dshnarw @ May 22 2009, 01:00 PM)

This post, unlike my other recent ones, is not meant to make you mad (although I stand by my points in the others), so please take a moment to look at it objectively.
Again, not personal?

QUOTE (dshnarw @ May 22 2009, 01:00 PM)

For example - choosing a macro lens, you could have looked up a list of macro lenses for Canon, Sigma, and Tamron, and read reviews to narrow down the list. The first one to be crossed off would have been the one you chose.
I honestly don't think I would have been able to come to this conclusion, B&H reviews don't mention a lot about aquarium macro photography, thats why I came here to ask the folks who use macro lenses with their tank shots. I didn't see the harm in asking this on a reef aquarium web site, and still don't. Most of the responses were not personal like yours, so I got the advice needed. I understand your point though, just thought I'd gone to the right place to discuss.
QUOTE (dshnarw @ May 22 2009, 01:00 PM)

You would have realized that you didn't know what 1:1 meant, and could have done a quick search and found an answer, likely in a macro photography primer like the one I posted a while back. Then, we'd have been glad to give opinions on the Canon 100 vs the Sigma 150 of whatever (In fact, I've made that very thread before). Once you help yourself, we can really help you.
Yep, again, I apologize for asking basic questions and expecting basic help.
I've found a different resource(s) to ask the basic stuff, no worries.
I'm not here to continue to argue with you nor hold grudges, glad you're wiling to help out beyond the basics, when I get to some stuff you feel you can help out one, please chime in, otherwise if you feel my questions are too basic, I ask you just ignore me and move on to other posts, I'll try to limit the basic stuff here though, so I don't start another tangent again. Thanks.

BTW; Nice picture! Wicked cool.