QUOTE (Menace @ Apr 30 2008, 06:40 PM)

Thank you for making my point..
Did you know that he was looking to house livestock that would normally thrive in the Puget Sound, N/S Atlantic, N/S Pacific, close to land, further out to see?
And again...salinity in open ocean water is 33-38ppt. "further out to se
a" is open ocean water. If they're found there, they're used to mean seawater salinities. Secondly - the OP stated California coast above - you haven't found ANY articles that show that the California coast has salinities less than that. Scripps water, pulled straight out of the ocean at Scripps, has a salinity equivalent to mean seawater salinity. Seawater salinity along the coast of Maine, the most likely location to get coldwater livestock from the Atlantic are mean seawater, according to the FWS in Maine. Species located in the Puget Sound available for coldwater tanks aren't endemic to the Sound, and therefore also grow along the NW coast of the US - which I've already established at 33ppt - just below mean seawater.
QUOTE
The point is. IMOA. All life taken from it's natural habitat (and let's be honest) for our amusement, should be cared for as well as we possibly can.
Lumping everything into the ranges that everyone uses (so it must be right) is not the way I personally do it.
Just because it "works". doesn't mean it's good.
No, the point is that the species available for coldwater aquaria are cared for as well as we can care for them at mean ocean water salinities. You're making a big stink about a non-issue. And you still haven't found us any data that says otherwise.
QUOTE
Think about it. less than 10 years ago everyone thought undergravel filters for reefs were perfect and all you needed, and no one trusted one of those darn protein skimmers.
This hobby is an evolving one. You nor I nor anyone else on this planet, knows everything.
The only way to be sure, is to do it the way it's already done in nature (or as close as we can get to it).
Yes, the hobby is evolving...but salinities of ocean water are the same...33-38ppt. As close as we an get is to choose the mean seawater level, especially in the case of choosing livestock from several areas, as you proclaim the OP to be interested in doing.
QUOTE
Both of you are sill missing my point and I'm not going to sit here and keep arguing with you.
He asked a question and I was simply trying to help him.
I didn't come into this thread and start flaming anyone that didn't think the way i do..
How about you give you're advice and let other people give there's and then the OP can decide what's best for him?
Is that really that hard?
You wouldn't have been called out if your original argument was coherent and had any relevance to this thread. You haven't been flamed yet, but we could start, if you wish.
I could care less about your advice, until it's wrong. When it's wrong, I will call it, as I've repeatedly done in this thread. If you have some info to back up your advice, lets see it. I've shown you plenty for my stance.
Now...if the OP were interested in a Med. Sea biotope, THEN we could discuss a different salinity.