I never said name/lineage didn't have any effect on price.
yes you did:
has nothing to do with what they are named.
But in most cases I disagree that adding a name in itself is going to drive prices up...
If I were to take my plain green zoas and name them DHaut's Super Special Kryptonite Zoas, I might could get a couple more dollars per polyp, but I couldn't get $100.
If I were to take my plain green zoas and name them DHaut's Super Special Kryptonite Zoas, I might could get a couple more dollars per polyp, but I couldn't get $100.
show me where i said that adding a name automatically increases price. i merely said it could influence it - and you just admitted that point (and negated your original point above).
so what? they used to go for a lot more and in the future the price will continue to fall. they could be called "Green palys" and "Purple palys" and it wouldn't change the price much as long as there are no readily available substitutes. and what about the named corals that are dirt cheap like a green slimer? this point is, well, pointless.
Commonality has nothing to do with their price drop - they've been commonly available since before I entered the hobby. The reason they're cheaper now is because they've lost their hype.
I don't see any difference between lineage and naming - if anything lineage actually has a tangible benefit that should raise price which you already addressed.
the name simply has to do with the color morph of the coral. watermelon zoas for example - whats the lineage? they've got a name...but i see wild colonies that are undoubtedly watermelon zoas all the time. the problem i have is when people do try to associate a name and lineage (again, as if only ONE person in the world got this particular coral morph and it all spread from there). the tangible benefit of lineage - aquaculture - is fine with me, as well as a small price increase from knowing it was aquacultured (not because it was in tyree's tank). it's the part where people start complaining about "you can't call that a........because it doesn't have lineage from........" that i have an issue with.
If I sold Tyree my green zoas and he put Tyree's green zoas on it and people started tracking the lineage, maybe he could get a slight price bump from people who care about name brand items or heartiness of the coral, but most people would just move on to a substitute good, like the billion other green zoas that are readily available. if he puts Tyree's Platinum Gold Zoas on a rare color morph that few people have ever seen and that doesn't have any close substitute, he's going to be able to bank, not because of the name but because of the scarcity. as for the other people who have the exact same morph, i highly doubt they'll suffer a massive price drop because they can't claim lineage. the purists may not bite, but there are plenty of people who would.
Tyree could put his name on a brown zoanthid and the market would go nuts based solely on his name. He's gotten pretty close before. The Tyree blue chalice still goes for more than ORA's blue chalice- and they're the same coral. Why? because Tyree naming something = hype.
NCRF is catering to a niche market. Plain and simple. But no matter what they certify, name, and track, the primary price driver will always be how much of that particular coral is available in the hobby.
Hype outdoes availability in most cases. 6 years ago, i could get a blue chalice colony for $50. When I bought my original mini carpets, they were $10. Now, one frag of a blue chalice is $50, and mini carpets go for $40 on Fraggle Reef, $100 on Atlantis. Naming is just one step of many in hyping up a coral - how, exactly, would you have known about them if they hadn't been named?








