QUOTE (Needreefunds @ Mar 27 2009, 08:08 PM)

How do the two interact within yourself?
In the way I mentioned above. The physical world is the one that science is capable of working in but science can say very little about ethics and nothing about purpose.
For example: It is nice to think of the blooming of flowers in the spring as the work of God and it is, but it is not the mystery that it used to be. It would be somewhat foolish, don't you think, to do on insisting that we do not and cannot understand this aspect of plant development.
Plant biologists are able to describe the process of flower development, right down to what hormones are produced where and what receptors they interact with. They can manipulate plant genomes to remove or alter the genes that code for these hormones and/or receptors and fundamentally change the way that plants work.
Now does this take ground away from God? God used to open the flowers, right? Wrong! He created the universe, he defined the laws that allow life to exist so he did create plants and thus he is responsible for their blooming. Why should this change the nature or the greatness of God?
Does he open each of them individually? Maybe, but science can't test that hypothesis. What science can offer is repeatable, manipulatable and predictable results that indicate that biochemical machinery is directly responsible for it.
Plant scientists can tell you
how it happens, but they can't say
why. Oh, they might come up with evolutionary arguments for it but that isn't really answering why, it is just punting the question further into the past.
Why should things exist?
QUOTE (Needreefunds @ Mar 27 2009, 08:08 PM)

That is to say do you find it difficult to be both a man of science and of strong faith?
I don't know that I would call it difficult but it isn't something that just happens, at least not in biology. The developments of "naturalism", biology and geology over the last 180 years have begun to explore the details what in our cells makes us what we are. This inevitably mixes with our innate desire to know
why we are here...
For most of our history, we have been in the dark about the simple question of
how we are here or
how we might have gotten here. Now that we have some physical evidence that points to physical, not just mythical or spiritual, mechanisms by which we have become what we are, we turn with an even stronger desire to the question of
why we are here. Not just as a species, but individually. We all feel as though there is purpose to our lives.
As C.S. Lewis put it, just because you feel like eating a cheeseburger doesn't mean you're going to get one but doesn't that feeling strongly imply that hunger is a real thing even though it is nebulous? So then, does not the (nearly) universal feeling that there is a higher power or that there is more to the universe than just we can see strongly implies that such a thing exists? Of course we haven't discussed what form such a "power" might take but that fits less into the discussion of science/faith and more into theology.
And thus, science educates faith with the hows that have thus far been difficult or impossible to understand and faith provides the framework on which to hang the hows. Without some understanding of
why things are here, about
why there is a universe rather than a void, the hows mean nothing.